Estée Lauder Double Wear vs Armani Luminous Silk
Opposite finishes. Double Wear is the long-wear one: medium-to-full coverage and matte, with Estée Lauder's claim of 36 hours of transfer-proof, waterproof wear and oil control, in 57 shades. Luminous Silk is the glow one: oil-free, buildable medium coverage with a satin finish.
Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation costs 25% less per ounce: $51.26 / fl oz against $68.02 / fl oz.
Estée Lauder
Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation
$52
- Long-wear foundation
- 30 ml, $51.26 / fl oz
- Sold by Amazon.com
- #11 in Foundation Makeup
Giorgio Armani Beauty
Luminous Silk Foundation
$69
- Medium-coverage foundation
- 30 ml, $68.02 / fl oz
- Resellers only, so not linked here
Which one
Estée Lauder Double Wear if you want a matte finish that holds through a long day on oily skin.
Armani Luminous Silk if you want a satin, skin-like finish.
Or a dupe for either
Revlon ColorStay Longwear Makeup for Combination/Oily Skin
for Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation
$12.48vs $52−76% per oz
Built on the same long-wear system: cyclopentasiloxane and water with trimethylsiloxysilicate, the resin that sets a foundation into a transfer-resistant film, plus tribehenin and titanium dioxide.
What it does worse: Double Wear has SPF 10, while ColorStay adds zinc oxide for SPF 15 and hyaluronic acid, and splits its shades between a combination/oily and a normal/dry formula.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation
for Giorgio Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation
$8vs $69−88% per oz
#7 in Foundation Makeup on Amazon
Built the same way: a water-in-silicone emulsion of water, dimethicone, isododecane and glycerin, held by the same emulsifier (cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 dimethicone), clay thickener and magnesium sulfate, for a satin glow at medium, buildable coverage.
What it does worse: Armani adds alcohol, sorbitol, niacinamide and fragrance and makes 44 shades, while e.l.f. adds emollient esters, boron nitride for slip and a 1% hibiscus complex, leaves out fragrance and makes 36.
Questions
What is the difference between Estée Lauder Double Wear and Armani Luminous Silk?
Opposite finishes. Double Wear is the long-wear one: medium-to-full coverage and matte, with Estée Lauder's claim of 36 hours of transfer-proof, waterproof wear and oil control, in 57 shades. Luminous Silk is the glow one: oil-free, buildable medium coverage with a satin finish.
Which is cheaper, Estée Lauder Double Wear or Armani Luminous Silk?
Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation costs 25% less per ounce: $51.26 / fl oz against $68.02 / fl oz.
Is there a dupe for Estée Lauder Double Wear?
Revlon ColorStay Longwear Makeup for Combination/Oily Skin, about $12.48, 76% less. Built on the same long-wear system: cyclopentasiloxane and water with trimethylsiloxysilicate, the resin that sets a foundation into a transfer-resistant film, plus tribehenin and titanium dioxide. Double Wear has SPF 10, while ColorStay adds zinc oxide for SPF 15 and hyaluronic acid, and splits its shades between a combination/oily and a normal/dry formula. About a quarter of the price per ounce.
Is there a dupe for Armani Luminous Silk?
e.l.f. Cosmetics Soft Glam Satin Foundation, about $8, 88% less. Built the same way: a water-in-silicone emulsion of water, dimethicone, isododecane and glycerin, held by the same emulsifier (cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 dimethicone), clay thickener and magnesium sulfate, for a satin glow at medium, buildable coverage. Armani adds alcohol, sorbitol, niacinamide and fragrance and makes 44 shades, while e.l.f. adds emollient esters, boron nitride for slip and a 1% hibiscus complex, leaves out fragrance and makes 36. The same 30 ml for under an eighth of the price.